Side by side, and honest about what does not compare
Up to 4 screened assets. Every row says which asset types can answer it, so a blank is never mistaken for a zero.
| Field | USDD USDD |
|---|---|
| Type | Crypto |
| Shariah status | NON-COMPLIANT |
| Screening completeness | Complete |
| Methodologies passed | 4/7 crypto |
| Activity screened by | screened from token attributes |
| Assessment date | 2026-08-29 |
| Days since screened | 36 |
| Token type Crypto only | stablecoin |
| Return mechanism Crypto only | none |
| Interest-bearing Crypto only | No |
| Genuine utility Crypto only | Yes |
Screening is a published methodology applied consistently, not a fatwa.
A verdict of NOT DETERMINED means the screen was
incomplete for that asset, not that it failed. A fund's verdict names the
instrument behind it: HOLDINGS for a portfolio
scored by weight, STRUCTURE for a
physically-backed commodity fund, which holds bullion rather than
companies and so is screened on the product itself.
See also: Back to the screener · How the screen works · Compare addresses assets as type:identifier, because 31 tickers name two different assets.