129,589 assets indexed · 8 baskets
Groupings that come out of the screen rather than out of a category list. Every basket is a query into the same filters the screener uses, so its definition is visible, its link is shareable, and its members change when the data does.
Groupings that come out of the screen, not out of a category list.
Each one is a query into the same filters the screener uses. Its definition is shown on the card, so you can check it — and its members change when the data does, rather than going stale in a hand-kept list.
Rated under all seven methodologies, and passes every one.
Seven methodologies disagree often enough that agreement is the rarest thing this engine finds. Nothing here rests on one opinion.
asset_type=stock min_passes=7 status=COMPLIANT
Interest-bearing debt under 1% of market capitalisation.
The ratio every methodology argues about, taken to the point where the argument stops mattering.
asset_type=stock max_debt_ratio=1
Under 1% of revenue from non-permissible sources.
The figure a purification calculation actually turns on. Low enough here that purification is close to a rounding error.
asset_type=stock max_npi_pct=1
Passes the screen and pays a dividend of 2% or more.
Income without interest. Dividend yield is not on file for every listing, so this is a floor rather than the whole market -- the count beside it says how much of the universe could be checked.
asset_type=stock min_div_yield=2 status=COMPLIANT
Mega-capitalisation companies that pass the screen.
The largest companies in the world are usually the hardest to clear. These clear.
asset_type=stock market_cap_bucket=mega status=COMPLIANT
Compliant, with revenue up 20% or more year on year.
Growth is where a screen usually breaks: fast companies borrow. These grew without it.
asset_type=stock min_rev_growth=20 status=COMPLIANT
Rated by several methodologies that do not agree.
Not a recommendation and not a warning — a reading list. These are the companies where which scholar you follow changes the answer, and a single-verdict product cannot show you them at all.
asset_type=stock disagreement=1
Cryptoassets with no interest-bearing mechanism.
A coin's screen asks different questions from a company's. This is the one that rules most of them out.
asset_type=crypto no_interest_bearing=1
Three groupings a US screener shows that this one does not. Each would need a data source this product has no honest access to, and a basket built without it would be a guess wearing a real name.