US EQUITIES CLOSED CRYPTO 24/7
HALAL TRADING ROOM Sharia-screened signals
TERMINAL

31,149 stocks · 501 cryptocurrencies screened

Sharia Compliance

Business activity and financial ratios for stocks, hand-reviewed-then-LLM-expanded reasoning for crypto — both checked against published Islamic finance methodologies before anything reaches a signal. Pick a market below for the full, searchable breakdown.

Read the methodology →
31,149
Stocks screened
501
Crypto assets
44,418
Funds screened
7
Equity methodologies
Coverage detail — registry denominators, and the 11,728 symbols we examined but could not rate

43,336 symbols examined in total · 31,608 carry a verdict (11,728 could not be rated)

The 10,192 in-house global issuers are out of 16,938 issuers in the registry (60.2%) · 6,746 cannot be priced

461 stocks additionally flagged for deeper review by our in-house ratio engine (82.9% checked so far) — a separate signal from the provider status above. Full breakdown →

ETFs & mutual funds

18,672 funds carry a verdict from our own look-through of their filed holdings — 318 compliant. A fund is screened on its actual portfolio, not on its name or its marketing, and one whose holdings we cannot cover far enough is reported as unrated rather than guessed at.

Browse the funds →

Where the standards disagree

Of 31,608 issuers with at least one method verified, this is how they divide. A split is not an error — it is two published standards dividing by different things and reaching different answers on the same filing.

Why they disagree →
Unanimous passevery verified method agrees 5,322
Split, majority passmore verified methods pass than fail 5,511
Split, majority failmore verified methods fail than pass 6,712
Unanimous failevery verified method agrees 14,063

12,223 of 31,608 issuers are split — the standards do not agree on them, and this site publishes all seven rather than averaging them into one label.

10,809 more issuers have no method verified at all. They are not counted above: “every method failed” and “no method could run” are different findings, and only one of them is about the company.

174 carry a compliant verdict that most of their verified methods do not support. They are surfaced here rather than quietly corrected.

Screening methodologies

Stocks are checked against seven published equity methodologies. Different standards can legitimately reach different verdicts on the same company — none is universally "correct."

See the full breakdown →
AAOIFI Usmani Dow Jones Islamic S&P Shariah MSCI Islamic MSCI Islamic M-Series FTSE Shariah
Why two separate methodologies

Stocks are screened by business activity plus financial ratios sourced from SEC filings — a company either does or doesn't operate in an excluded category, and its debt/interest-bearing-asset ratios either clear or don't clear published thresholds. Crypto has no filings or balance sheet to check — compliance instead turns on what a coin's underlying mechanism actually is (a real utility token vs. an interest-bearing yield product vs. a staking/speculative asset in genuine scholarly debate). See Methodology for the full stock rules and Is Crypto Halal? for the full crypto reasoning.

Tell us what's working, what's confusing, or what you want to see next — read by a real person, not a form that goes nowhere.