US EQUITIES CLOSED CRYPTO 24/7
HALAL TRADING ROOM Sharia-screened signals
TERMINAL

Compliance → Stocks · 12,002 symbols screened · provider data updated 2026-10-12 · 1970 refreshed in the last 7 days

Halal Stocks

Screened via Halal Terminal. Searches the cached watchlist snapshot — a full sweep runs at most every 31 days (last: 2026-10-08), plus a lighter weekly refresh for any stock that reported earnings that week. No live API call per search, so this stays fast even under real traffic.

12,002 screened · provider data updated 2026-10-12

How this page works

Cached watchlist snapshot screened via Halal Terminal — a full sweep runs at most every 31 days plus a weekly refresh for stocks that reported earnings. Business activity and financial ratios from SEC filings, checked against seven published methodologies. No live API call per search, so it stays fast.

Why this page exists

Business activity and financial ratios, sourced from SEC filings, checked against seven published methodologies before anything reaches a signal — compliance isn't a filter bolted on after the fact. Full detail on the methodology and why a specific verdict landed where it did is one click away on every row.

Read the methodology →
12,002 symbols with a provider verdict
+ 10,208 global issuers screened in-house, updated 2026-10-11
45,564 symbols examined by our own engine · 31,887 carry a verdict (13,677 could not be rated)
provider data updated 2026-10-12
2 other
Recently changed verdicts

25 stock verdicts changed in the last 7 days. Screening is not a one-off — when a re-scan, an earnings-triggered recheck or a price move crosses a ratio threshold, it's recorded here rather than quietly overwritten.

Why these numbers, what "needs review" means, and what's still pending

This page holds 12,002 symbols with a status, from two independent engines. 1,970 carry a reviewed third-party provider verdict; the rest were screened in-house against published ratio methodologies computed from primary filings. The provider verdict always wins where there is one — an in-house ratio never silently replaces a reviewed opinion.

Of the provider's 1,970: 1259 compliant, 589 non-compliant, 31 questionable (a real middle status some providers use — not a clean pass, not a confirmed fail), and 89 unrated (the provider has no data at all). Each status is counted separately, never merged into a single non-compliant bucket. A further 2 carried a provider hedge that our own screen answered in the failing direction, and are reported as not determined — we decline to assert non-compliant from our own ratios alone. Separately, 3 of those 1,970 cached entries are for symbols no longer on the current 1,967-symbol watchlist (e.g. an index reconstitution) — stale, not wrong. Every current watchlist symbol already has a real cached verdict — no coverage gap.

Needs review is a separate signal from a different engine (our own 7-methodology ratio + business-activity screen, see Methodology) — it never overrides the verdict shown above. It's checked in a small daily batch against a shared, limited daily quota (not the whole watchlist at once), so 1794/1967 (91.2%) is real, honest progress toward full coverage, not a stalled or broken engine.

Full Snapshot

Reset

Showing 301–400 of 12,002 matching.

SymbolNameStatusPassed / checkedExchangeRefreshed

Tell us what's working, what's confusing, or what you want to see next — read by a real person, not a form that goes nowhere.