ACGRXETF / FundAdvisors Capital Growth Fund
Verdicts genuinely change. Free email alert the moment ACGRX's does — no target price to set, unlike a price alert.
Whether this fund clears the published standards, and the filings behind that answer. The screen runs first and nothing on the trading side can override it.
Structure, momentum, positioning and levels. Separate from the Sharia verdict above, which this side never overrides.
Advisors Capital Growth Fund · NEIMAN FUNDS
9 holdings
UNVERIFIED None of this fund's 9 holdings matched a company in our screened universe. It does file equity positions — the shortfall is in our matching, not in the fund, and it can close on a later screen. Usually this is foreign listings or naming we have not yet resolved.
Largest holdings: Schwab Strategic Trust - Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF, Vanguard Index Funds - Vanguard Growth Index Fund, Vanguard Scottsdale Funds - Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund, SPDR Series Trust - State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF, Fidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF.
9 holdings, 0 matched (0% of weight). Portfolio as of 2026-06-30, filed 2026-08-26. Source: SEC Form N-PORT.
Portfolio shares are withheld: coverage is below the floor needed to state one. The holdings themselves are below, because the names are evidence you can check.
All holdings (9)
| Holding | Status | Weight | Every methodology, and the debt ratio behind it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schwab Strategic Trust - Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF | UNSCREENED | 18.78% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Vanguard Index Funds - Vanguard Growth Index Fund | UNSCREENED | 18.74% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Vanguard Scottsdale Funds - Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund | UNSCREENED | 15.00% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| SPDR Series Trust - State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | UNSCREENED | 14.83% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Fidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF | UNSCREENED | 9.89% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 | UNSCREENED | 9.86% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Vanguard Index Funds - Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund ETF Shares | UNSCREENED | 4.94% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Tidal ETF Trust - SoFi Select 500 ETF | UNSCREENED | 4.91% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Goldman Sachs Trust - Goldman Sachs Financial Square Government Fund Institutional Class | UNSCREENED | 2.85% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
Trade setup
Whether the technical picture shows an edge right now. Separate from the Sharia verdict, which this side never overrides.
Screened on its holdings, not its name
HTR reads the fund's filed holdings and screens each one, then reports the result by weight. A holding it cannot cover far enough is reported as unrated rather than counted as a pass.
| Holding | Weight | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| Schwab Strategic Trust - Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETFnot matched to a ticker | 18.78% | Not screened |
| Vanguard Index Funds - Vanguard Growth Index Fundnot matched to a ticker | 18.74% | Not screened |
| Vanguard Scottsdale Funds - Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fundnot matched to a ticker | 15.00% | Not screened |
| SPDR Series Trust - State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETFnot matched to a ticker | 14.83% | Not screened |
| Fidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFnot matched to a ticker | 9.89% | Not screened |
| Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1not matched to a ticker | 9.86% | Not screened |
| Vanguard Index Funds - Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund ETF Sharesnot matched to a ticker | 4.94% | Not screened |
| Tidal ETF Trust - SoFi Select 500 ETFnot matched to a ticker | 4.91% | Not screened |
| Goldman Sachs Trust - Goldman Sachs Financial Square Government Fund Institutional Classnot matched to a ticker | 2.85% | Not screened |
Top 9 of 9 holdings, 99.8% of the fund by weight. Every holding is screened, not only these.
What holds the number back
The positions keeping this fund short of 100% compliant by weight.
- Schwab Strategic Trust - Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETFnot screened18.78%
- Vanguard Index Funds - Vanguard Growth Index Fundnot screened18.74%
- Vanguard Scottsdale Funds - Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fundnot screened15.00%
- SPDR Series Trust - State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETFnot screened14.83%
- Fidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFnot screened9.89%
- Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1not screened9.86%
What changed, and when
Verdict history for ACGRX. A verdict that never moved is recorded too, so a quiet history reads as measured rather than missing.
- 2026-09-07 No change recorded No verdict change for ACGRX has been recorded since tracking began. The scan ledger records that the compliance detectors ran, not which symbols each pass covered.
ℹ️ no compliance scan has run for 5 days - this is not a reading of today
Pinch or scroll to zoom · drag to pan — both axes move · double-click to reset
This fund prices once a day, so its bars carry no intraday high or low — floor-trader pivots are not defined for it.
Price Forecast
The range is measured volatility (ATR over the horizon), not a target — a wider band means a more volatile asset, not a stronger view. The direction is the indicator tally below. Every forecast is recorded when made and scored against the real price when it comes due, including the wrong ones. Not a recommendation, and not a fatwa.
Technical Summary
Standard indicator thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20, MACD histogram sign, price vs. average) computed on daily bars. A summary of what common indicators say — not a recommendation, and not this site's own trading verdict.
Every indicator, and what it reads
| Indicator | Value | Signal |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 32.80 | NEUTRAL |
| Stochastic %K (14) | 9.43 | BUY |
| CCI (20) | -180.50 | BUY |
| Williams %R (14) | -90.57 | BUY |
| MACD (12,26,9) | -0.09 | SELL |
| ROC (10) | -5.15 | SELL |
| Momentum (10) | -0.65 | SELL |
| EMA (10) | 12.40 | SELL |
| SMA (10) | 12.51 | SELL |
| EMA (20) | 12.60 | SELL |
| SMA (20) | 12.70 | SELL |
| EMA (30) | 12.69 | SELL |
| SMA (30) | 12.85 | SELL |
| EMA (50) | 12.75 | SELL |
| SMA (50) | 12.84 | SELL |
| EMA (100) | 12.68 | SELL |
| SMA (100) | 12.73 | SELL |
| EMA (200) | 12.34 | SELL |
| SMA (200) | 12.27 | SELL |
SMC — Top Down
Market structure by timeframe, read from real bars. A bias per timeframe rather than a forecast — timeframes disagreeing is information, not noise.
Before you act on this
The questions worth asking about any verdict on this page, answered plainly.
Is a fund screened on its name?
No. HTR reads the fund's filed holdings and screens each one, then reports the result by weight. A fund marketed as Islamic still gets the same look-through as any other.
What does unrated weight mean?
It is the share of the fund whose holdings HTR cannot cover far enough to rate. It is reported as unrated rather than counted as compliant, because a holding nobody screened should not look like one that passed.
Does the issuer's board make it compliant?
It matters, and it is noted, but it does not replace the look-through. The board's judgement and the holdings screen are shown separately so you can see when they agree and when they do not.
How often is this re-screened?
When the fund files new holdings, and on a rolling basis besides. The date on the verdict above is the last time this fund was actually recomputed.
Open research, not a fatwa. HTR applies published screening standards to filings and publishes what they say, including when they disagree. Nothing here is financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell. Verdicts can change when new filings land.
Compare with
Same screen, different answers. Comparison is where the standards disagreeing becomes useful rather than confusing.
Peer screening computing — it will appear here on its own.
AI Summary
Plain-language summary of the evidence already on this page — the Sharia screen, structure, momentum, and order flow above. It explains the read; it doesn't make the call. Generated on demand (a live AI call), never run automatically.