AXMIXETF / FundAcclivity Mid Cap Multi-Style Fund
Verdicts genuinely change. Free email alert the moment AXMIX's does — no target price to set, unlike "Alert" above.
Whether this fund clears the published standards, and the filings behind that answer. The screen runs first and nothing on the trading side can override it.
Structure, momentum, positioning and levels. Separate from the Sharia verdict above, which this side never overrides.
Acclivity Mid Cap Multi-Style Fund · NORTHERN LIGHTS FUND TRUST II
319 holdings
NON-COMPLIANT 52.13% of portfolio weight is in non-compliant holdings, over the 5% threshold.
319 holdings, 288 matched (92% of weight). Portfolio as of 2025-09-30, filed 2025-11-26. Source: SEC Form N-PORT.
37.3% compliant 1.4% questionable 52.1% non-compliant 8.3% unscreened
| Non-compliant holding | Weight |
|---|---|
| DAL Delta Air Lines Inc. | 0.97% |
| HUM Humana Inc. | 0.96% |
| HIG The Hartford Insurance Group Inc. | 0.94% |
| ACGL Arch Capital Group Ltd. | 0.92% |
| UAL United Airlines Holdings Inc | 0.90% |
| SYF Synchrony Financial | 0.86% |
| CINF Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 0.84% |
| FOX Fox Corporation | 0.76% |
| WRB W.R. Berkley Corporation | 0.75% |
| MKL Markel Group Inc | 0.70% |
Trade setup
Whether the technical picture shows an edge right now. Separate from the Sharia verdict, which this side never overrides.
Acclivity Mid Cap Multi-Style Fund (AXMIX) is currently considered not halal (non-compliant), per our own look-through to its filed holdings. See the weight breakdown below for the reasoning.
What changed, and when
Verdict history for AXMIX. A verdict that never moved is recorded too, so a quiet history reads as measured rather than missing.
- 2026-09-07 No change recorded No verdict change for AXMIX has been recorded since tracking began. The scan ledger records that the compliance detectors ran, not which symbols each pass covered.
ℹ️ no compliance scan has run for 5 days - this is not a reading of today
SMC — Top Down
Market structure by timeframe, read from real bars. A bias per timeframe rather than a forecast — timeframes disagreeing is information, not noise.
Before you act on this
The questions worth asking about any verdict on this page, answered plainly.
Is a fund screened on its name?
No. HTR reads the fund's filed holdings and screens each one, then reports the result by weight. A fund marketed as Islamic still gets the same look-through as any other.
What does unrated weight mean?
It is the share of the fund whose holdings HTR cannot cover far enough to rate. It is reported as unrated rather than counted as compliant, because a holding nobody screened should not look like one that passed.
Does the issuer's board make it compliant?
It matters, and it is noted, but it does not replace the look-through. The board's judgement and the holdings screen are shown separately so you can see when they agree and when they do not.
How often is this re-screened?
When the fund files new holdings, and on a rolling basis besides. The date on the verdict above is the last time this fund was actually recomputed.
Open research, not a fatwa. HTR applies published screening standards to filings and publishes what they say, including when they disagree. Nothing here is financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell. Verdicts can change when new filings land.
Compare with
Same screen, different answers. Comparison is where the standards disagreeing becomes useful rather than confusing.
Peer screening computing — it will appear here on its own.
AI Summary
Plain-language summary of the evidence already on this page — the Sharia screen, structure, momentum, and order flow above. It explains the read; it doesn't make the call. Generated on demand (a live AI call), never run automatically.