US EQUITIES CLOSED CRYPTO 24/7
HALAL TRADING ROOM Sharia-screened signals
TERMINAL
EL

ELFCryptoaelf

$0.06478
Sharia status
QUESTIONABLE
Our screen across 7 scholarly standards
4 of 7 pass our own screen — the standards disagree
Methodology breakdown (4/7 compliant)
AAOIFI ● PASS
Usmani ● FAIL
Dow Jones ● PASS
S&P Shariah ● PASS
MSCI ● FAIL
MSCI M ● PASS
FTSE ● FAIL

Our own screen, from this company’s filed figures. The per-ratio working is not on this page in this view.

🕌Open research, not a fatwa — verify with your own scholar.

Trade setup

Whether the technical picture shows an edge right now. Separate from the Sharia verdict, which this side never overrides.

SEPARATE FROM SHARIAH
Reading momentum — the price history for this coin is still loading.

aelf (ELF) is currently marked questionable - not a clean pass or a confirmed fail, per our own multi-standard crypto screen. Our full reasoning, the standards behind it and the facts it rests on are below.

🕌 In-house Compliance Research

Methodology breakdown (4/7 compliant)
AAOIFI ● PASS
Usmani ● FAIL
Dow Jones ● PASS
S&P Shariah ● PASS
MSCI ● FAIL
MSCI M ● PASS
FTSE ● FAIL

Our own screen, from this company’s filed figures. The per-ratio working is not on this page in this view.

How close is it to flipping?

Every current reading against its own line, closest first. A verdict is only as durable as that distance.

AAOIFI Standard 21 (% of market cap)non permissible income ratio 4.6pts
Usmani (% of total assets)non permissible income ratio 4.6pts
Dow Jones Islamic Market (% of 24-mo avg market cap)non permissible income ratio 4.6pts
Usmani (% of total assets)debt ratio 6.1pts
MSCI Islamic Index (% of total assets)debt ratio 5.7pts
FTSE Shariah Global Equity Index Series (% of total assets)debt ratio 1.8pts

What changed, and when

Verdict history for ELF. Nothing has been recorded for it yet.

ℹ️ Coin verdicts are not change-tracked yet. An empty history here means nothing has been recorded, not that nothing has moved.

Tracked investors holding ELF
InvestorFirmPositionWeightAs of
Ray Dalio Bridgewater Associates $0M 0.0% 2026-06-30

From the most recent 13F on file. A 13F reports long US equity positions quarterly and in arrears — it is what a manager held on the report date, not what they hold today.

0.230.220.220.220.212025-04-152025-04-16

Pinch or scroll to zoom · drag to pan — both axes move · double-click to reset

Support & Resistance
S3
0.19
S2
0.20
S1
0.20
PIVOT
0.21
R1
0.22
R2
0.23
R3
0.24

Classic floor-trader pivots from the last completed daily bar. Highlighted pills are the levels bracketing the current price.

Price Forecast

The range is measured volatility (ATR over the horizon), not a target — a wider band means a more volatile asset, not a stronger view. The direction is the indicator tally below. Every forecast is recorded when made and scored against the real price when it comes due, including the wrong ones. Not a recommendation, and not a fatwa.

7-day expected range
0.003455 – 0.1261
±94.67% from 0.06478, made 2026-10-08 · resolves 2026-10-15
STRONG SELL
from 19 indicators
61.9% of our last 5789 forecasts landed inside their stated range, and 49.9% called the direction correctly.

Our Sharia Verdict

QUESTIONABLE Genuinely contested

The standards we screen on do not agree about this asset.

5 of 6 permit it; 1 do not. We report that as unsettled rather than picking a side for you.

5 of 6 agree 1 differ
What it issmart contract platform
How holders earnnone
Basismedium confidence

Independently corroborated. 2 separate models read this coin and agreed on every fact the verdict turns on.

Not established: transparent governance. Our verdict does not assume anything about these — where they would change the answer, we say so rather than guessing.

The 7 standards we screen on, one by one
Fiqh Council of North America (currency treatment) COMPLIANT

Default permissibility and no riba. Note the Council ruled on Bitcoin specifically - applying it to a non-currency token like this one is an extension by analogy, not something the Council itself ruled.

Fiqh Council of North America, “Regarding the Islamic Ruling on Bitcoins” — default permissibility; treated as fiat currency, so all riba rulings and bai’ al-sarf apply

AMJA (permissible absent clear prohibition) COMPLIANT

No clear evidence of prohibition: no riba, no impermissible underlying activity, and a real function.

Assembly of Muslim Jurists of America — Dr. Salah Al-Sawy (Secretary General) and Dr. Yasir Qadhi: transactions are permissible unless clear evidence prohibits them

SC Malaysia SAC (digital assets as mal) QUESTIONABLE

This standard requires transparent governance to be established, and we could not establish it. An unestablished requirement is not a satisfied one, so this reads as unresolved rather than as a pass.

Securities Commission Malaysia, Shariah Advisory Council, 233rd-234th meetings, June-July 2020

Amanah Advisors layered screen (project / token / staking) COMPLIANT

Project, token and reward layers all pass.

Amanah Advisors, Crypto Shariah Screening Framework (Mufti Faraz Adam)

Amanie Advisors (staking as a service fee) COMPLIANT

A real function, and no interest-derived return.

Amanie Advisors (Dr. Daud Bakar) — Shariah certification of Ethereum staking; validation treated as a real service rendered to the network rather than a return on capital

AAOIFI riba principles (adapted to token returns) COMPLIANT

No interest-derived return to the holder.

AAOIFI Shariah Standards - riba and non-permissible income, applied to the token's return mechanism (no dedicated crypto standard exists)

Restrictive position (gharar / no intrinsic backing) NON-COMPLIANT

No intrinsic backing and no issuing authority; excessive gharar under this position, which applies to most digital assets including Bitcoin.

Mufti Muhammad Taqi Usmani (crypto trading and investment impermissible); Dar al-Ifta al-Misriyyah (Egypt, 2018); Diyanet Isleri Baskanligi (Turkey, 2017)

The restrictive position above is shown but excluded from our own verdict: it rejects most digital assets including Bitcoin on gharar alone, so letting it decide would mark nearly everything non-compliant — which is neither our conclusion nor a defensible reading of the evidence. Hiding it would be worse.

This is our own screening verdict, reached by applying each named standard ourselves to the facts above, last established 2026-08-29. Research, not a fatwa — for a decision that binds you, ask a scholar you trust.

Technical Summary

Standard indicator thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20, MACD histogram sign, price vs. average) computed on daily bars. A summary of what common indicators say — not a recommendation, and not this site's own trading verdict.

STRONG SELL
19 indicators
OscillatorsSTRONG SELL
0 buy · 4 neutral · 3 sell
Moving averagesSTRONG SELL
0 buy · 0 neutral · 12 sell
Every indicator, and what it reads
IndicatorValueSignal
RSI (14)46.70NEUTRAL
Stochastic %K (14)48.52NEUTRAL
CCI (20)-43.50NEUTRAL
Williams %R (14)-51.48NEUTRAL
MACD (12,26,9)-0.00SELL
ROC (10)-2.86SELL
Momentum (10)-0.01SELL
EMA (10)0.22SELL
SMA (10)0.22SELL
EMA (20)0.23SELL
SMA (20)0.23SELL
EMA (30)0.24SELL
SMA (30)0.24SELL
EMA (50)0.25SELL
SMA (50)0.24SELL
EMA (100)0.29SELL
SMA (100)0.30SELL
EMA (200)0.35SELL
SMA (200)0.37SELL

About aelf

aelf (ELF) is a decentralized cloud computing blockchain platform designed to facilitate the creation of decentralized applications (dApps) with its unique sidechain architecture. It aims to enhance scalability and efficiency for businesses and developers in the blockchain ecosystem. Source: CoinPaprika.com

PlatformSmart ContractsEthereum (ETH) Token (ERC-20)ScalableCross-chainBlockchain ServiceComputing & Cloud InfrastructureBinance Coin (BNB) Token (BEP-20)Layer 1 (L1)AI (Artificial Intelligence)

Background via CoinPaprika — informational, not part of the verdict.

SMC — Top Down

Market structure by timeframe, read from real bars. A bias per timeframe rather than a forecast — timeframes disagreeing is information, not noise.

The market-structure read is still being computed — it runs in the background rather than holding this page up. Reload in a moment and it will be here.

Momentum & Volume

Rate of change and relative volume against this symbol's own recent history. Momentum describes what price has done; it is not a claim about what it will do.

$106.05
Volume POC (today)
$105.12 – $106.29
Value area

Trade Flow

Aggressive buying against aggressive selling on the recent tape, by trade size. It shows who was crossing the spread, not who turned out to be right.

Aggressive buy (inflow) vs sell (outflow) volume from the recent Binance tape, by trade size. Market context only — not a signal.

Inflow
$55K
Net
−$20K
Outflow
$75K
$0
XL
$0
$0
L
$0
$0
M
$0
$55K
S
$75K

From the last 1000 aggregate trades · via Binance.

Peer Movement

How the rest of the sector moved over the same window. Context for a price move, never a cause of one.

Peer movement computing — it will appear here on its own.

Before you act on this

The questions worth asking about any verdict on this page, answered plainly.

Why is crypto screened differently?

The ratio screen needs a balance sheet. A coin has neither filings nor a debt figure, so the same test cannot run. Compliance turns instead on what the token actually is and does.

What makes a coin non-compliant here?

Most commonly, the token is a claim on interest: a lending protocol, a yield-bearing stablecoin, or a product whose return comes from lending at interest rather than from work performed.

Is a compliant verdict permanent?

No. A protocol can add a lending product or change what its token does. Any verdict that moves is recorded, and a verdict that has not moved is reported as such rather than assumed.

Is the scholarly debate resolved?

Not on every coin. Where real disagreement exists, HTR records both positions instead of picking one. This is a research tool; a ruling for your own holding should come from a qualified scholar.

Open research, not a fatwa. HTR applies published screening standards to filings and publishes what they say, including when they disagree. Nothing here is financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell. Verdicts can change when new filings land.

Compare with

Same screen, different answers. Comparison is where the standards disagreeing becomes useful rather than confusing.

Peer screening computing — it will appear here on its own.

AI Summary

Plain-language summary of the evidence already on this page — the Sharia screen, structure, momentum, and order flow above. It explains the read; it doesn't make the call. Generated on demand (a live AI call), never run automatically.

Tell us what's working, what's confusing, or what you want to see next — read by a real person, not a form that goes nowhere.