FEDMETF / FundFlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund
Verdicts genuinely change. Free email alert the moment FEDM's does — no target price to set, unlike a price alert.
Whether this fund clears the published standards, and the filings behind that answer. The screen runs first and nothing on the trading side can override it.
Structure, momentum, positioning and levels. Separate from the Sharia verdict above, which this side never overrides.
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund ETF · FlexShares Trust
254 holdings · as of 2026-07-31 (3.3 months ago) The fund may have traded since. SEC Form N-PORT is filed quarterly and lags the period it covers, so these are the most recent holdings on file, not the fund’s holdings today.
NON-COMPLIANT 49.20% of portfolio weight is in non-compliant holdings, over the 5% threshold.
0.00% of that is conventional interest-bearing debt, identified from the fund's own filing rather than by screening an issuer. Sukuk are deliberately excluded from this test and are never counted here.
254 holdings, 211 matched (98% of weight). Portfolio as of 2026-07-31, filed 2026-09-25. Source: SEC Form N-PORT.
4.36% of this portfolio’s income is non-permissible — weighted across holdings, computed over 78% of portfolio weight (172 of 254 holdings). The common approach purifies that proportion of income received — dividends — not of the position’s value. We report the ratio; what to do with it is a question for your own scholar.
47.9% compliant 0.0% questionable 49.2% non-compliant 2.5% unscreened
All holdings (254) · showing 251–254
| Holding | Status | Weight | Every methodology, and the debt ratio behind it |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.00% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.00% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.00% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| N/A | UNSCREENED | 0.00% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
The published standards disagree about this fund by 14 points of portfolio weight — 46.0% of it passes AAOIFI, 31.6% passes MSCI Islamic. Which number is yours depends on which standard you follow.
These bars are the financial-ratio result under each standard — debt, receivables and interest income. They do not screen what the business does, so a holding can pass every ratio here and still be questionable or non-compliant on activity. The blended verdict above accounts for both.
ratios pass on 46.0% ratios fail on 48.8% 4.7% not rated under AAOIFI
ratios pass on 35.2% ratios fail on 55.6% 8.8% not rated under Usmani
ratios pass on 40.9% ratios fail on 50.5% 8.1% not rated under Dow Jones Islamic
ratios pass on 40.9% ratios fail on 48.6% 10.1% not rated under S&P Shariah
ratios pass on 31.6% ratios fail on 58.1% 9.9% not rated under MSCI Islamic
ratios pass on 40.9% ratios fail on 50.5% 8.1% not rated under MSCI Islamic M-Series
ratios pass on 37.5% ratios fail on 52.1% 10.0% not rated under FTSE Shariah
210 of 254 listed holdings carry our own per-methodology verdicts (97% of weight). The rest hold a provider verdict with no methodology breakdown, and are counted as rated by none. Of those, 52 (24% of weight) also carry the underlying debt ratio; the rest show a verdict without the figure behind it.
| Non-compliant holding | Weight |
|---|---|
| SHEL Shell plc | 1.56% |
| BBVA.MC Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA | 1.52% |
| CBA.AX Commonwealth Bank of Australia | 1.40% |
| 8306.T Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 1.32% |
| ISP.MI Intesa Sanpaolo SpA | 1.20% |
| ZURN.SW Zurich Insurance Group AG | 1.20% |
| CM.TO Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 1.20% |
| ENB.TO Enbridge, Inc. | 1.16% |
| MFC.TO Manulife Financial Corp. | 1.13% |
| ALV.DE Allianz SE | 1.08% |
Methodology breakdown computing — it will appear here on its own.
Trade setup
Whether the technical picture shows an edge right now. Separate from the Sharia verdict, which this side never overrides.
Why this signal?
The factors behind the read, each shown with the figure it rests on, including the ones pointing the other way.
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) is currently considered not halal (non-compliant), per our own look-through to its filed holdings. See its filed holdings and the weight breakdown below for the reasoning.
🕌 In-house Compliance Research
Computing the full ratio and business-activity breakdown for FEDM — this runs off the critical path so the page paints first. It will appear here on its own.
Pinch or scroll to zoom · drag to pan — both axes move · double-click to reset
Classic floor-trader pivots from the last completed daily bar. Highlighted pills are the levels bracketing the current price.
Price Forecast
The range is measured volatility (ATR over the horizon), not a target — a wider band means a more volatile asset, not a stronger view. The direction is the indicator tally below. Every forecast is recorded when made and scored against the real price when it comes due, including the wrong ones. Not a recommendation, and not a fatwa.
Technical Summary
Standard indicator thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20, MACD histogram sign, price vs. average) computed on daily bars. A summary of what common indicators say — not a recommendation, and not this site's own trading verdict.
Every indicator, and what it reads
| Indicator | Value | Signal |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 46.90 | NEUTRAL |
| Stochastic %K (14) | 0.84 | BUY |
| CCI (20) | -66.06 | NEUTRAL |
| Williams %R (14) | -99.16 | BUY |
| MACD (12,26,9) | 0.04 | BUY |
| ROC (10) | -0.03 | SELL |
| Momentum (10) | -0.02 | SELL |
| EMA (10) | 64.61 | SELL |
| SMA (10) | 64.65 | SELL |
| EMA (20) | 64.50 | SELL |
| SMA (20) | 64.41 | SELL |
| EMA (30) | 64.47 | SELL |
| SMA (30) | 64.17 | SELL |
| EMA (50) | 64.42 | SELL |
| SMA (50) | 64.60 | SELL |
| EMA (100) | 63.83 | BUY |
| SMA (100) | 64.16 | SELL |
| EMA (200) | 62.02 | BUY |
| SMA (200) | 62.15 | BUY |
About FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund
The underlying index is designed to reflect the performance of a selection of companies that exhibit certain ESG characteristics in the aggregate, while also seeking to provide broad-market, core exposure to publicly traded equity securities issued by companies domiciled in developed market countries, excluding the U.S. The fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in the securities of the index and in ADRs and GDRs based on the securities in the index.
Background via Yahoo Finance — informational, not part of the verdict.
Weak — low conviction, small size or skip
SMC — Top Down
Market structure by timeframe, read from real bars. A bias per timeframe rather than a forecast — timeframes disagreeing is information, not noise.
| Timeframe | Bias | Bars |
|---|---|---|
| 📅 Daily | RANGING | 43 |
| ⏲ 5-Min | BULLISH | 24 |
Momentum & Volume
Rate of change and relative volume against this symbol's own recent history. Momentum describes what price has done; it is not a claim about what it will do.
Peer Movement
How the rest of the sector moved over the same window. Context for a price move, never a cause of one.
Peer movement computing — it will appear here on its own.
Before you act on this
The questions worth asking about any verdict on this page, answered plainly.
Is a fund screened on its name?
No. HTR reads the fund's filed holdings and screens each one, then reports the result by weight. A fund marketed as Islamic still gets the same look-through as any other.
What does unrated weight mean?
It is the share of the fund whose holdings HTR cannot cover far enough to rate. It is reported as unrated rather than counted as compliant, because a holding nobody screened should not look like one that passed.
Does the issuer's board make it compliant?
It matters, and it is noted, but it does not replace the look-through. The board's judgement and the holdings screen are shown separately so you can see when they agree and when they do not.
How often is this re-screened?
When the fund files new holdings, and on a rolling basis besides. The date on the verdict above is the last time this fund was actually recomputed.
Open research, not a fatwa. HTR applies published screening standards to filings and publishes what they say, including when they disagree. Nothing here is financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell. Verdicts can change when new filings land.
Compare with
Same screen, different answers. Comparison is where the standards disagreeing becomes useful rather than confusing.
Peer screening computing — it will appear here on its own.
Insider Activity (90d)
Insider transactions reported in the last ninety days. Insiders sell for reasons that have nothing to do with a view, so a sale on its own is not a signal.
NO DATA 0 buys · 0 sells
COT Positioning — E-MINI S&P 500 - CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE
The weekly CFTC Commitments of Traders report for the broad market it tracks, not for this symbol. Positioning context for the tape — it says nothing about this company.
NEUTRAL report date 2026-11-03 · Asset managers net 928584 (+5135)
AI Summary
Plain-language summary of the evidence already on this page — the Sharia screen, structure, momentum, and order flow above. It explains the read; it doesn't make the call. Generated on demand (a live AI call), never run automatically.