MMOJXETF / FundMassMutual Overseas Fund
Verdicts genuinely change. Free email alert the moment MMOJX's does — no target price to set, unlike "Alert" above.
Whether this fund clears the published standards, and the filings behind that answer. The screen runs first and nothing on the trading side can override it.
Structure, momentum, positioning and levels. Separate from the Sharia verdict above, which this side never overrides.
MassMutual Overseas Fund · MASSMUTUAL SELECT FUNDS
121 holdings
NON-COMPLIANT 48.45% of portfolio weight is in non-compliant holdings, over the 5% threshold.
121 holdings, 115 matched (96% of weight). Portfolio as of 2026-06-30, filed 2026-08-27. Source: SEC Form N-PORT.
46.5% compliant 0.0% questionable 48.4% non-compliant 3.8% unscreened
| Non-compliant holding | Weight |
|---|---|
| BNP.PA BNP Paribas SA | 2.65% |
| ISP.MI Intesa Sanpaolo SpA | 1.96% |
| RR.L Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC | 1.63% |
| NWG.L NatWest Group PLC | 1.41% |
| ING ING Groep NV | 1.39% |
| BATS.L British American Tobacco PLC | 1.34% |
| TTE.PA TotalEnergies SE | 1.33% |
| 8630.T Sompo Holdings Inc | 1.31% |
| 8316.T Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group Inc | 1.29% |
| A5G.IR AIB Group PLC | 1.26% |
Trade setup
Whether the technical picture shows an edge right now. Separate from the Sharia verdict, which this side never overrides.
MassMutual Overseas Fund (MMOJX) is currently considered not halal (non-compliant), per our own look-through to its filed holdings. See the weight breakdown below for the reasoning.
What changed, and when
Verdict history for MMOJX. A verdict that never moved is recorded too, so a quiet history reads as measured rather than missing.
- 2026-09-07 No change recorded No verdict change for MMOJX has been recorded since tracking began. The scan ledger records that the compliance detectors ran, not which symbols each pass covered.
Tracked since 2026-09-07.
Pinch or scroll to zoom · drag to pan — both axes move · double-click to reset
This fund prices once a day, so its bars carry no intraday high or low — floor-trader pivots are not defined for it.
Technical Summary
Standard indicator thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20, MACD histogram sign, price vs. average) computed on daily bars. A summary of what common indicators say — not a recommendation, and not this site's own trading verdict.
Every indicator, and what it reads
| Indicator | Value | Signal |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 43.50 | NEUTRAL |
| Stochastic %K (14) | 50.00 | NEUTRAL |
| CCI (20) | 0.00 | NEUTRAL |
| Williams %R (14) | -50.00 | NEUTRAL |
| MACD (12,26,9) | 0.00 | BUY |
| ROC (10) | 0.00 | NEUTRAL |
| Momentum (10) | 0.00 | NEUTRAL |
| EMA (10) | 9.35 | SELL |
| SMA (10) | 9.35 | NEUTRAL |
| EMA (20) | 9.36 | SELL |
| SMA (20) | 9.35 | NEUTRAL |
| EMA (30) | 9.37 | SELL |
| SMA (30) | 9.35 | SELL |
| EMA (50) | 9.39 | SELL |
| SMA (50) | 9.43 | SELL |
| EMA (100) | 9.40 | SELL |
SMC — Top Down
Market structure by timeframe, read from real bars. A bias per timeframe rather than a forecast — timeframes disagreeing is information, not noise.
Before you act on this
The questions worth asking about any verdict on this page, answered plainly.
Is a fund screened on its name?
No. HTR reads the fund's filed holdings and screens each one, then reports the result by weight. A fund marketed as Islamic still gets the same look-through as any other.
What does unrated weight mean?
It is the share of the fund whose holdings HTR cannot cover far enough to rate. It is reported as unrated rather than counted as compliant, because a holding nobody screened should not look like one that passed.
Does the issuer's board make it compliant?
It matters, and it is noted, but it does not replace the look-through. The board's judgement and the holdings screen are shown separately so you can see when they agree and when they do not.
How often is this re-screened?
When the fund files new holdings, and on a rolling basis besides. The date on the verdict above is the last time this fund was actually recomputed.
Open research, not a fatwa. HTR applies published screening standards to filings and publishes what they say, including when they disagree. Nothing here is financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell. Verdicts can change when new filings land.
Compare with
Same screen, different answers. Comparison is where the standards disagreeing becomes useful rather than confusing.
Peer screening computing — it will appear here on its own.
AI Summary
Plain-language summary of the evidence already on this page — the Sharia screen, structure, momentum, and order flow above. It explains the read; it doesn't make the call. Generated on demand (a live AI call), never run automatically.