SCCIXETF / FundCarillon Reams Core Bond Fund
Verdicts genuinely change. Free email alert the moment SCCIX's does — no target price to set, unlike "Alert" above.
Whether this fund clears the published standards, and the filings behind that answer. The screen runs first and nothing on the trading side can override it.
Structure, momentum, positioning and levels. Separate from the Sharia verdict above, which this side never overrides.
Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund · Carillon Series Trust
265 holdings
This fund holds short positions, so exposure is counted gross — long and short both count as exposure rather than netting off, and the weights below therefore sum to 105% of net assets rather than 100%. Shares of the portfolio are shown as shares of that gross exposure.
NON-COMPLIANT At least 46.08% of portfolio weight is in non-compliant holdings — already over the 5% threshold, so the verdict is settled whatever the unmatched 58% turns out to be. Matching more holdings can only raise this share, never lower it.
36.07% of that is conventional interest-bearing debt, identified from the fund's own filing rather than by screening an issuer. Sukuk are deliberately excluded from this test and are never counted here.
265 holdings, 56 matched (45% of weight). Portfolio as of 2026-06-30, filed 2026-08-27. Source: SEC Form N-PORT.
12.39% of this portfolio’s income is non-permissible — weighted across holdings, computed over 6% of portfolio weight (20 of 265 holdings). The common approach purifies that proportion of income received — dividends — not of the position’s value. We report the ratio; what to do with it is a question for your own scholar.
Portfolio shares are withheld: coverage is below the floor needed to state one. The holdings themselves are below, because the names are evidence you can check.
All holdings (265) · showing 251–265
| Holding | Status | Weight | Every methodology, and the debt ratio behind it |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP Morgan Mortgage Trust | UNSCREENED | 0.06% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Verus Securitization Trust | UNSCREENED | 0.05% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Morgan Stanley Residential Mor | UNSCREENED | 0.05% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| BMW Vehicle Owner Trust | UNSCREENED | 0.05% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| GM Financial Consumer Automobi | UNSCREENED | 0.05% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| JP Morgan Mortgage Trust | UNSCREENED | 0.04% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Se | UNSCREENED | 0.04% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| RIDE 2025-SHRE | UNSCREENED | 0.04% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| JP Morgan Mortgage Trust | UNSCREENED | 0.04% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| BMW Vehicle Owner Trust | UNSCREENED | 0.03% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Fannie Mae | NON_COMPLIANT | 0.02% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust | UNSCREENED | 0.02% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust | UNSCREENED | 0.01% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| UNP RR CO 2005 PASS TRST | UNSCREENED | 0.01% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust | UNSCREENED | 0.00% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
The published standards disagree about this fund by 3 points of portfolio weight — 2.7% of it passes AAOIFI, 0.2% passes Usmani. Which number is yours depends on which standard you follow.
These bars are the financial-ratio result under each standard — debt, receivables and interest income. They do not screen what the business does, so a holding can pass every ratio here and still be questionable or non-compliant on activity. The blended verdict above accounts for both.
ratios pass on 2.7% ratios fail on 8.6% 94.1% not rated under AAOIFI
ratios pass on 0.2% ratios fail on 7.1% 98.1% not rated under Usmani
ratios pass on 2.3% ratios fail on 8.2% 94.9% not rated under Dow Jones Islamic
ratios pass on 2.3% ratios fail on 7.8% 95.3% not rated under S&P Shariah
ratios pass on 0.2% ratios fail on 7.1% 98.1% not rated under MSCI Islamic
ratios pass on 2.3% ratios fail on 8.2% 94.9% not rated under MSCI Islamic M-Series
ratios pass on 0.2% ratios fail on 7.1% 98.1% not rated under FTSE Shariah
22 of 265 listed holdings carry our own per-methodology verdicts (11% of weight). The rest hold a provider verdict with no methodology breakdown, and are counted as rated by none. Of those, 21 (11% of weight) also carry the underlying debt ratio; the rest show a verdict without the figure behind it.
| Non-compliant holding | Weight |
|---|---|
| US TREASURY N/B | 6.18% |
| Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac | 5.51% |
| Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac | 4.90% |
| US TREASURY N/B | 4.36% |
| US TREASURY N/B | 3.95% |
| US TREASURY N/B | 3.51% |
| US TREASURY N/B | 3.17% |
| TREASURY BILL | 1.25% |
| US TREASURY N/B | 0.83% |
| JPM JPMORGAN CHASE & CO | 0.76% |
Trade setup
Whether the technical picture shows an edge right now. Separate from the Sharia verdict, which this side never overrides.
Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund (SCCIX) is currently considered not halal (non-compliant), per our own look-through to its filed holdings. See its filed holdings and the weight breakdown below for the reasoning.
Screened on its holdings, not its name
HTR reads the fund's filed holdings and screens each one, then reports the result by weight. A holding it cannot cover far enough is reported as unrated rather than counted as a pass.
| Holding | Weight | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| US TREASURY N/Bnot matched to a ticker | 6.18% | Non-compliant |
| Fannie Mae or Freddie Macnot matched to a ticker | 5.51% | Non-compliant |
| Fannie Mae or Freddie Macnot matched to a ticker | 4.90% | Non-compliant |
| US TREASURY N/Bnot matched to a ticker | 4.36% | Non-compliant |
| US TREASURY N/Bnot matched to a ticker | 3.95% | Non-compliant |
| US TREASURY N/Bnot matched to a ticker | 3.51% | Non-compliant |
| US TREASURY N/Bnot matched to a ticker | 3.17% | Non-compliant |
| TREASURY BILLnot matched to a ticker | 1.25% | Non-compliant |
| GENERAL MOTORS FINL COnot matched to a ticker | 1.04% | Not screened |
| BENCHMARK Mortgage Trustnot matched to a ticker | 1.00% | Not screened |
Top 10 of 265 holdings, 34.9% of the fund by weight. Every holding is screened, not only these.
What holds the number back
The positions keeping this fund short of 100% compliant by weight.
- US TREASURY N/Bnon-compliant6.18%
- Fannie Mae or Freddie Macnon-compliant5.51%
- Fannie Mae or Freddie Macnon-compliant4.90%
- US TREASURY N/Bnon-compliant4.36%
- US TREASURY N/Bnon-compliant3.95%
- US TREASURY N/Bnon-compliant3.51%
What changed, and when
Verdict history for SCCIX. A verdict that never moved is recorded too, so a quiet history reads as measured rather than missing.
- 2026-09-07 No change recorded No verdict change for SCCIX has been recorded since tracking began. The scan ledger records that the compliance detectors ran, not which symbols each pass covered.
ℹ️ no compliance scan has run for 2 days - this is not a reading of today
Pinch or scroll to zoom · drag to pan — both axes move · double-click to reset
This fund prices once a day, so its bars carry no intraday high or low — floor-trader pivots are not defined for it.
Price Forecast
The range is measured volatility (ATR over the horizon), not a target — a wider band means a more volatile asset, not a stronger view. The direction is the indicator tally below. Every forecast is recorded when made and scored against the real price when it comes due, including the wrong ones. Not a recommendation, and not a fatwa.
Technical Summary
Standard indicator thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20, MACD histogram sign, price vs. average) computed on daily bars. A summary of what common indicators say — not a recommendation, and not this site's own trading verdict.
Every indicator, and what it reads
| Indicator | Value | Signal |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 57.40 | NEUTRAL |
| Stochastic %K (14) | 66.67 | NEUTRAL |
| CCI (20) | 63.40 | NEUTRAL |
| Williams %R (14) | -33.33 | NEUTRAL |
| MACD (12,26,9) | 0.01 | BUY |
| ROC (10) | 0.77 | BUY |
| Momentum (10) | 0.08 | BUY |
| EMA (10) | 10.44 | BUY |
| SMA (10) | 10.45 | SELL |
| EMA (20) | 10.41 | BUY |
| SMA (20) | 10.38 | BUY |
| EMA (30) | 10.40 | BUY |
| SMA (30) | 10.34 | BUY |
| EMA (50) | 10.41 | BUY |
| SMA (50) | 10.40 | BUY |
| EMA (100) | 10.46 | SELL |
| SMA (100) | 10.49 | SELL |
| EMA (200) | 10.51 | SELL |
| SMA (200) | 10.55 | SELL |
SMC — Top Down
Market structure by timeframe, read from real bars. A bias per timeframe rather than a forecast — timeframes disagreeing is information, not noise.
Before you act on this
The questions worth asking about any verdict on this page, answered plainly.
Is a fund screened on its name?
No. HTR reads the fund's filed holdings and screens each one, then reports the result by weight. A fund marketed as Islamic still gets the same look-through as any other.
What does unrated weight mean?
It is the share of the fund whose holdings HTR cannot cover far enough to rate. It is reported as unrated rather than counted as compliant, because a holding nobody screened should not look like one that passed.
Does the issuer's board make it compliant?
It matters, and it is noted, but it does not replace the look-through. The board's judgement and the holdings screen are shown separately so you can see when they agree and when they do not.
How often is this re-screened?
When the fund files new holdings, and on a rolling basis besides. The date on the verdict above is the last time this fund was actually recomputed.
Open research, not a fatwa. HTR applies published screening standards to filings and publishes what they say, including when they disagree. Nothing here is financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell. Verdicts can change when new filings land.
Compare with
Same screen, different answers. Comparison is where the standards disagreeing becomes useful rather than confusing.
Peer screening computing — it will appear here on its own.
AI Summary
Plain-language summary of the evidence already on this page — the Sharia screen, structure, momentum, and order flow above. It explains the read; it doesn't make the call. Generated on demand (a live AI call), never run automatically.