SRGAXETF / FundStringer Tactical Adaptive Risk Fund (formerly, Stringer Growth Fund)
Verdicts genuinely change. Free email alert the moment SRGAX's does — no target price to set, unlike "Alert" above.
Whether this fund clears the published standards, and the filings behind that answer. The screen runs first and nothing on the trading side can override it.
Structure, momentum, positioning and levels. Separate from the Sharia verdict above, which this side never overrides.
Stringer Tactical Adaptive Risk Fund (formerly, Stringer Growth Fund) · 360 Funds
17 holdings
UNVERIFIED None of this fund's 17 holdings matched a company in our screened universe. It does file equity positions — the shortfall is in our matching, not in the fund, and it can close on a later screen. Usually this is foreign listings or naming we have not yet resolved.
Largest holdings: Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF, State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF, PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF, Vanguard International Dividend Appreciation ETF, SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF.
17 holdings, 0 matched (0% of weight). Portfolio as of 2025-11-30, filed 2026-01-28. Source: SEC Form N-PORT.
Portfolio shares are withheld: coverage is below the floor needed to state one. The holdings themselves are below, because the names are evidence you can check.
All holdings (17)
| Holding | Status | Weight | Every methodology, and the debt ratio behind it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | UNSCREENED | 14.83% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF | UNSCREENED | 11.39% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF | UNSCREENED | 8.20% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Vanguard International Dividend Appreciation ETF | UNSCREENED | 7.40% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF | UNSCREENED | 6.81% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | UNSCREENED | 6.27% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF | UNSCREENED | 5.70% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| iShares Global Financials ETF | UNSCREENED | 5.34% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | UNSCREENED | 5.32% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | UNSCREENED | 5.26% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Vanguard Information Technology ETF | UNSCREENED | 5.07% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF | UNSCREENED | 4.26% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF | UNSCREENED | 3.69% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF | UNSCREENED | 3.19% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| NYLI Merger Arbitrage ETF | UNSCREENED | 3.19% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | UNSCREENED | 2.87% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
| Federated Hermes Government Obligations Fund | UNSCREENED | 1.27% | no in-house ratios for this holding |
Trade setup
Whether the technical picture shows an edge right now. Separate from the Sharia verdict, which this side never overrides.
Screened on its holdings, not its name
HTR reads the fund's filed holdings and screens each one, then reports the result by weight. A holding it cannot cover far enough is reported as unrated rather than counted as a pass.
| Holding | Weight | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETFnot matched to a ticker | 14.83% | Not screened |
| State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETFnot matched to a ticker | 11.39% | Not screened |
| PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETFnot matched to a ticker | 8.20% | Not screened |
| Vanguard International Dividend Appreciation ETFnot matched to a ticker | 7.40% | Not screened |
| SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETFnot matched to a ticker | 6.81% | Not screened |
| iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETFnot matched to a ticker | 6.27% | Not screened |
| Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETFnot matched to a ticker | 5.70% | Not screened |
| iShares Global Financials ETFnot matched to a ticker | 5.34% | Not screened |
| iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETFnot matched to a ticker | 5.32% | Not screened |
| SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETFnot matched to a ticker | 5.26% | Not screened |
Top 10 of 17 holdings, 76.5% of the fund by weight. Every holding is screened, not only these.
What holds the number back
The positions keeping this fund short of 100% compliant by weight.
- Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETFnot screened14.83%
- State Street SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETFnot screened11.39%
- PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETFnot screened8.20%
- Vanguard International Dividend Appreciation ETFnot screened7.40%
- SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETFnot screened6.81%
- iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETFnot screened6.27%
What changed, and when
Verdict history for SRGAX. A verdict that never moved is recorded too, so a quiet history reads as measured rather than missing.
- 2026-09-07 No change recorded No verdict change for SRGAX has been recorded since tracking began. The scan ledger records that the compliance detectors ran, not which symbols each pass covered.
ℹ️ no compliance scan has run for 2 days - this is not a reading of today
SMC — Top Down
Market structure by timeframe, read from real bars. A bias per timeframe rather than a forecast — timeframes disagreeing is information, not noise.
Before you act on this
The questions worth asking about any verdict on this page, answered plainly.
Is a fund screened on its name?
No. HTR reads the fund's filed holdings and screens each one, then reports the result by weight. A fund marketed as Islamic still gets the same look-through as any other.
What does unrated weight mean?
It is the share of the fund whose holdings HTR cannot cover far enough to rate. It is reported as unrated rather than counted as compliant, because a holding nobody screened should not look like one that passed.
Does the issuer's board make it compliant?
It matters, and it is noted, but it does not replace the look-through. The board's judgement and the holdings screen are shown separately so you can see when they agree and when they do not.
How often is this re-screened?
When the fund files new holdings, and on a rolling basis besides. The date on the verdict above is the last time this fund was actually recomputed.
Open research, not a fatwa. HTR applies published screening standards to filings and publishes what they say, including when they disagree. Nothing here is financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell. Verdicts can change when new filings land.
Compare with
Same screen, different answers. Comparison is where the standards disagreeing becomes useful rather than confusing.
Peer screening computing — it will appear here on its own.
AI Summary
Plain-language summary of the evidence already on this page — the Sharia screen, structure, momentum, and order flow above. It explains the read; it doesn't make the call. Generated on demand (a live AI call), never run automatically.