US EQUITIES CLOSED CRYPTO 24/7
HALAL TRADING ROOM Sharia-screened signals
TERMINAL
ST

STXCrypto

$848.99
Sharia status
NOT YET SCREENED
Our reviewed halal crypto list
4 of 7 pass our own screen — the standards disagree
Methodology breakdown (4/7 compliant)
AAOIFI ● PASS
Usmani ● FAIL
Dow Jones ● PASS
S&P Shariah ● PASS
MSCI ● FAIL
MSCI M ● PASS
FTSE ● FAIL

Our own screen, from this company’s filed figures. The per-ratio working is not on this page in this view.

🕌Open research, not a fatwa — verify with your own scholar.

Trade setup

Whether the technical picture shows an edge right now. Separate from the Sharia verdict, which this side never overrides.

SEPARATE FROM SHARIAH
Reading momentum — the price history for this coin is still loading.

Trade plan

Posted with a stop, a target and the level that invalidates it. It resolves into the public record either way.

CANDLE · SCALP
Entry
$824.18
Stop
$812.39
Target
$847.76
Risk : Reward 2.0R

🕌 In-house Compliance Research

Methodology breakdown (4/7 compliant)
AAOIFI ● PASS
Usmani ● FAIL
Dow Jones ● PASS
S&P Shariah ● PASS
MSCI ● FAIL
MSCI M ● PASS
FTSE ● FAIL

Our own screen, from this company’s filed figures. The per-ratio working is not on this page in this view.

How close is it to flipping?

Every current reading against its own line, closest first. A verdict is only as durable as that distance.

MSCI Islamic Index (% of total assets)receivables ratio 0.8pts
AAOIFI Standard 21 (% of market cap)non permissible income ratio 4.8pts
Usmani (% of total assets)non permissible income ratio 4.8pts
Usmani (% of total assets)debt ratio 6.5pts
MSCI Islamic Index (% of total assets)debt ratio 6.1pts
FTSE Shariah Global Equity Index Series (% of total assets)debt ratio 2.8pts

What changed, and when

Verdict history for STX. Nothing has been recorded for it yet.

ℹ️ Coin verdicts are not change-tracked yet. An empty history here means nothing has been recorded, not that nothing has moved.

Tracked investors holding STX
InvestorFirmPositionWeightAs of
Stephen Mandel Lone Pine Capital $965M 5.9% 2026-06-30
Chase Coleman Tiger Global Management $275M 1.1% 2026-06-30
Ray Dalio Bridgewater Associates $193M 0.8% 2026-06-30
Stanley Druckenmiller Duquesne Family Office $118M 2.3% 2026-06-30
Wahed Invest Wahed Invest LLC $5M 0.5% 2026-06-30
Azzad Asset Management Azzad Asset Management $4M 0.3% 2026-06-30
Ken Fisher Fisher Asset Management $1M 0.0% 2026-06-30
Saturna Capital Amana Mutual Funds Trust $1M 0.0% 2026-06-30

From the most recent 13F on file. A 13F reports long US equity positions quarterly and in arrears — it is what a manager held on the report date, not what they hold today.

0.630.500.370.250.122025-10-042026-04-052026-10-04

Pinch or scroll to zoom · drag to pan — both axes move · double-click to reset

Support & Resistance
S3
0.33
S2
0.35
S1
0.37
PIVOT
0.38
R1
0.40
R2
0.42
R3
0.44

Classic floor-trader pivots from the last completed daily bar. Highlighted pills are the levels bracketing the current price.

Price Forecast

The range is measured volatility (ATR over the horizon), not a target — a wider band means a more volatile asset, not a stronger view. The direction is the indicator tally below. Every forecast is recorded when made and scored against the real price when it comes due, including the wrong ones. Not a recommendation, and not a fatwa.

7-day expected range
0.2525 – 0.3933
±21.81% from 0.3229, made 2026-09-25 · resolves 2026-10-02
STRONG BUY
from 19 indicators
61.5% of our last 5668 forecasts landed inside their stated range, and 49.8% called the direction correctly.

Technical Summary

Standard indicator thresholds (RSI 30/70, Stochastic 20/80, CCI ±100, Williams %R −80/−20, MACD histogram sign, price vs. average) computed on daily bars. A summary of what common indicators say — not a recommendation, and not this site's own trading verdict.

STRONG BUY
19 indicators
OscillatorsSTRONG BUY
3 buy · 3 neutral · 1 sell
Moving averagesSTRONG BUY
12 buy · 0 neutral · 0 sell
Every indicator, and what it reads
IndicatorValueSignal
RSI (14)65.50NEUTRAL
Stochastic %K (14)63.11NEUTRAL
CCI (20)109.18SELL
Williams %R (14)-36.89NEUTRAL
MACD (12,26,9)0.00BUY
ROC (10)18.59BUY
Momentum (10)0.06BUY
EMA (10)0.35BUY
SMA (10)0.35BUY
EMA (20)0.33BUY
SMA (20)0.32BUY
EMA (30)0.31BUY
SMA (30)0.30BUY
EMA (50)0.28BUY
SMA (50)0.27BUY
EMA (100)0.25BUY
SMA (100)0.21BUY
EMA (200)0.25BUY
SMA (200)0.22BUY

Latest Signal — 2026-10-02

CANDLE
Type · SCALP
824.18
Entry
812.39
Stop
847.76
Target

Stop 812.39 Now 848.99 Target 847.76

SMC — Top Down

Market structure by timeframe, read from real bars. A bias per timeframe rather than a forecast — timeframes disagreeing is information, not noise.

The market-structure read is still being computed — it runs in the background rather than holding this page up. Reload in a moment and it will be here.

Trade Flow

Aggressive buying against aggressive selling on the recent tape, by trade size. It shows who was crossing the spread, not who turned out to be right.

Aggressive buy (inflow) vs sell (outflow) volume from the recent Binance tape, by trade size. Market context only — not a signal.

Inflow
$80K
Net
+$25K
Outflow
$55K
$0
XL
$0
$0
L
$0
$0
M
$0
$80K
S
$55K

From the last 1000 aggregate trades · via Binance.

Peer Movement

How the rest of the sector moved over the same window. Context for a price move, never a cause of one.

Peer movement computing — it will appear here on its own.

Before you act on this

The questions worth asking about any verdict on this page, answered plainly.

Why is crypto screened differently?

The ratio screen needs a balance sheet. A coin has neither filings nor a debt figure, so the same test cannot run. Compliance turns instead on what the token actually is and does.

What makes a coin non-compliant here?

Most commonly, the token is a claim on interest: a lending protocol, a yield-bearing stablecoin, or a product whose return comes from lending at interest rather than from work performed.

Is a compliant verdict permanent?

No. A protocol can add a lending product or change what its token does. Any verdict that moves is recorded, and a verdict that has not moved is reported as such rather than assumed.

Is the scholarly debate resolved?

Not on every coin. Where real disagreement exists, HTR records both positions instead of picking one. This is a research tool; a ruling for your own holding should come from a qualified scholar.

Open research, not a fatwa. HTR applies published screening standards to filings and publishes what they say, including when they disagree. Nothing here is financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell. Verdicts can change when new filings land.

Compare with

Same screen, different answers. Comparison is where the standards disagreeing becomes useful rather than confusing.

Peer screening computing — it will appear here on its own.

AI Summary

Plain-language summary of the evidence already on this page — the Sharia screen, structure, momentum, and order flow above. It explains the read; it doesn't make the call. Generated on demand (a live AI call), never run automatically.

Tell us what's working, what's confusing, or what you want to see next — read by a real person, not a form that goes nowhere.